Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 18:07:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F95FCAAA6B26874DB9FC06F910E5C8429C79973B103306372DE75AD9E4B073D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Personal Opinion. And sources in proposed notes reference two incidents and a single bit of graffiti. They do not evidence any 'bans' or real 'no-go zones' as falsely claimed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762144624217407503
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F95FCAAA6B26874DB9FC06F910E5C8429C79973B103306372DE75AD9E4B073D
  • createdAtMillis - 1708970845474
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17621446242174075036F95FCAAA6B26874DB9FC06F910E5C8429C79973B103306372DE75AD9E4B073D