Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 15:29:00 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6C731876BB96D37A7FDBD390E7B869361EDE6F86C3A45329EB87B33D7D5B15C
Participant Details

Original Note:

既に2022年4月に 当時の防衛副大臣が「誤解を招く表現であり、不適切だった」と答弁しています 『鬼木誠・防衛副大臣はこの日の同委員会で、「陸上幕僚監部が資料を作成した」と認めたうえで、「反戦デモについて合法的に行われる場合も含めて、一様にグレーゾーン事態の例として記述したことは誤解を招く表現であり、不適切だった」と答弁した。』 https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASQ4N6H4ZQ4NUTFK00H.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762033290121564244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6C731876BB96D37A7FDBD390E7B869361EDE6F86C3A45329EB87B33D7D5B15C
  • createdAtMillis - 1708961340772
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762033290121564244F6C731876BB96D37A7FDBD390E7B869361EDE6F86C3A45329EB87B33D7D5B15C