Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 08:11:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 816CE07BA81C568B07F04C23726C2EC40DE595D5A068E584DB5F025C72171FF7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, you’re literally proving his point by attempting to note him for no valid reason. This post has nothing to do with clickbait and a broken Wikipedia link isn’t a source worthy of being a part of a community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761926238736622045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 816CE07BA81C568B07F04C23726C2EC40DE595D5A068E584DB5F025C72171FF7
  • createdAtMillis - 1708935108404
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761926238736622045816CE07BA81C568B07F04C23726C2EC40DE595D5A068E584DB5F025C72171FF7