Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 08:32:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDA9E92942BE65E523E49211CF639AC50148749D355CC553F99395D0CD69A3DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The tweet correctly reports the opinion of the complainant and links to the article which gives the store's response. It is disputed as to whether or not the store's response is racial discrimination under UK law, making it a matter of opinion rather than an objective fact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761878112214589611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDA9E92942BE65E523E49211CF639AC50148749D355CC553F99395D0CD69A3DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1708936376143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761878112214589611FDA9E92942BE65E523E49211CF639AC50148749D355CC553F99395D0CD69A3DE