Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 17:31:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE300C3BE7D3A027E51FFA2C1BF1408348B2421B4BDA038F32DD5F4A79E4F556
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The tweet correctly reports the opinion of the complainant and links to the article which gives the store's response. It is disputed as to whether or not the store's response is racial discrimination under UK law, making it a matter of opinion rather than an objective fact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761878112214589611
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE300C3BE7D3A027E51FFA2C1BF1408348B2421B4BDA038F32DD5F4A79E4F556
  • createdAtMillis - 1708968667936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761878112214589611AE300C3BE7D3A027E51FFA2C1BF1408348B2421B4BDA038F32DD5F4A79E4F556