Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-26 06:27:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C16B5F4251D71B52565E66653A10727475AE01FE2EC63C550E21C4A02BFB1804
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Whatever you think of the way the post is titled, it is factually correct, is from a news organisation and readers are able to click through to read the details. The article itself provides ample commentary. Use replies for your CN's.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761688368230903937
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C16B5F4251D71B52565E66653A10727475AE01FE2EC63C550E21C4A02BFB1804
  • createdAtMillis - 1708928829460
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761688368230903937C16B5F4251D71B52565E66653A10727475AE01FE2EC63C550E21C4A02BFB1804