Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-25 09:44:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3431B6A7A492D93D8B66FCBB83E3E78211B4D1567E12326D03A0F0EC566701FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Whatever you think of the way the post is titled, it is factually correct, is from a news organisation and readers are able to click through to read the details. The article itself provides ample commentary. Use replies for your CN's.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761688368230903937
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3431B6A7A492D93D8B66FCBB83E3E78211B4D1567E12326D03A0F0EC566701FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1708854285666
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17616883682309039373431B6A7A492D93D8B66FCBB83E3E78211B4D1567E12326D03A0F0EC566701FE