Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-25 00:09:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEC6321A9C84459307E714D2C63924046E3346CE206E0D7EAEE92CCA97334E1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

If she failed to understand the effects of the bill she supported one might argue it suggests something about her capability as a legislator, but if so it doesn't necessarily mean she's being less than honest here. In either case it feels like something to discuss in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761538535952392399
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEC6321A9C84459307E714D2C63924046E3346CE206E0D7EAEE92CCA97334E1D
  • createdAtMillis - 1708819755892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761538535952392399CEC6321A9C84459307E714D2C63924046E3346CE206E0D7EAEE92CCA97334E1D