Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-25 23:53:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9065D46A5547762E72714064D5C6D0E9286AF7702095CFCD4D1C93232187DD89
Participant Details

Original Note:

If she failed to understand the effects of the bill she supported one might argue it suggests something about her capability as a legislator, but if so it doesn't necessarily mean she's being less than honest here. In either case it feels like something to discuss in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761538535952392399
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9065D46A5547762E72714064D5C6D0E9286AF7702095CFCD4D1C93232187DD89
  • createdAtMillis - 1708905229752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17615385359523923999065D46A5547762E72714064D5C6D0E9286AF7702095CFCD4D1C93232187DD89