Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-25 04:16:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 700C7FC327C4DB9C2E6E91B8361E1DB3E04DC8452635FB339018B95B6F2CCDE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

If she failed to understand the effects of the bill she supported one might argue it suggests something about her capability as a legislator, but if so it doesn't necessarily mean she's being less than honest here. In either case it feels like something to discuss in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761538535952392399
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 700C7FC327C4DB9C2E6E91B8361E1DB3E04DC8452635FB339018B95B6F2CCDE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1708834588815
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761538535952392399700C7FC327C4DB9C2E6E91B8361E1DB3E04DC8452635FB339018B95B6F2CCDE5