Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-25 10:54:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8080342DD211F27EBD8C973DFE614256023726096BEE4DAA48663514DB48A2E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context may be beneficial, but the 1st CN uses Wikipedia, which is very unreliable per their own admission: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source A well-written CN with neutral language & unbiased reliable sources may be helpful. The current CN isn’t. It only belongs in comments as an opinion. NNN for now.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761493542533206237
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8080342DD211F27EBD8C973DFE614256023726096BEE4DAA48663514DB48A2E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1708858463476
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17614935425332062378080342DD211F27EBD8C973DFE614256023726096BEE4DAA48663514DB48A2E3