Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 19:15:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1A6A552D7867C88711FAB8C7AEB6C9B640E688A910CB5F058F51F6F80A1AFC0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This Twitter user was in fact, not blocked by Manchester city, as you can see that the header in his picture does not match Manchester city’s actual Twitter header. https://twitter.com/ManCity?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761433035675722127
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1A6A552D7867C88711FAB8C7AEB6C9B640E688A910CB5F058F51F6F80A1AFC0
  • createdAtMillis - 1708802109060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1761433035675722127F1A6A552D7867C88711FAB8C7AEB6C9B640E688A910CB5F058F51F6F80A1AFC0