Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 23:03:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F652D1E4C43BE362A8B905C84CFA9EF1F3E021471895F9F112D48688AB344803
Participant Details

Original Note:

While this may be true of their @x posts, the seemingly defamatory articles they have written still appear online and are accessible. https://bylinetimes.com/2023/12/14/witnesses-interviewed-as-police-and-murdoch-probes-into-dan-wootton-continue/ https://bylinetimes.com/2023/10/11/disappearing-dan-wootton-articles-show-a-serious-need-for-s40-alternative/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761419910800875549
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F652D1E4C43BE362A8B905C84CFA9EF1F3E021471895F9F112D48688AB344803
  • createdAtMillis - 1708815809558
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761419910800875549F652D1E4C43BE362A8B905C84CFA9EF1F3E021471895F9F112D48688AB344803