Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 17:23:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3431B6A7A492D93D8B66FCBB83E3E78211B4D1567E12326D03A0F0EC566701FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While this may be true of their @x posts, the seemingly defamatory articles they have written still appear online and are accessible. https://bylinetimes.com/2023/12/14/witnesses-interviewed-as-police-and-murdoch-probes-into-dan-wootton-continue/ https://bylinetimes.com/2023/10/11/disappearing-dan-wootton-articles-show-a-serious-need-for-s40-alternative/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1761419910800875549
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 3431B6A7A492D93D8B66FCBB83E3E78211B4D1567E12326D03A0F0EC566701FE
createdAtMillis - 1708795438122
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17614199108008755493431B6A7A492D93D8B66FCBB83E3E78211B4D1567E12326D03A0F0EC566701FE