Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-25 05:24:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 581E7C716F57BB86102BB357A2E37EC08FD92B0898E620651D93DEFCE2A6F39D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Begum’s appeal was not dismissed because she was Muslim but because the court rules that the decision to revoke her citizenship was not unlawful. The court acknowledged that the decision may seem harsh but also that Begum created her own misfortune: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Begum-v-SSHD-CA-2023-000900-2024-EWCA-Civ-152.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761324780802760868
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 581E7C716F57BB86102BB357A2E37EC08FD92B0898E620651D93DEFCE2A6F39D
  • createdAtMillis - 1708838665311
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761324780802760868581E7C716F57BB86102BB357A2E37EC08FD92B0898E620651D93DEFCE2A6F39D