Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 11:50:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D23918A6A5DE29E9305FA5C6E8B58ED6A2C0892B5E61DF7C7319BD19BB5B00BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

El contrato pudo ser más o menos moralmente correcto pero no hubo nada ilegal, la nota debería estar en comentarios, pues no hay información falsa

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761265633000395224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D23918A6A5DE29E9305FA5C6E8B58ED6A2C0892B5E61DF7C7319BD19BB5B00BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1708775412325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761265633000395224D23918A6A5DE29E9305FA5C6E8B58ED6A2C0892B5E61DF7C7319BD19BB5B00BC