Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 18:47:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31B418DF9D666DEFBD1EF1275E1424C9A8646471F131BA455057E02F4BAA7DC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The quoted text does not appear in the February 16, 2024 ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court, but rather from a Slate article published February 21, 2024 postulating possible consequences of the ruling. PDF of the 131 page ruling: https://publicportal-api.alappeals.gov/courts/68f021c4-6a44-4735-9a76-5360b2e8af13/cms/case/343d203a-b13d-463a-8176-c46e3ae4f695/docketentrydocuments/e3d95592-3cbe-4384-afa6-063d4595aa1d Slate article: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/02/abortion-bans-alabama-ivf-explained.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761239574523560180
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31B418DF9D666DEFBD1EF1275E1424C9A8646471F131BA455057E02F4BAA7DC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1708800450829
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176123957452356018031B418DF9D666DEFBD1EF1275E1424C9A8646471F131BA455057E02F4BAA7DC8