Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 19:09:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B256B6A289DD14BE73682314BA72357C6F7180D5EC52E99B30137638A370C976
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note quoted Wikipedia is correct but irrelevant, because it's 2022 data, while the post clearly quoted the data from 2013-15. Yes, it may be outdated, but it's 100% correct. If you want to use 2022 data, then note that at that timeframe, Asian American make even more.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761231916672733655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B256B6A289DD14BE73682314BA72357C6F7180D5EC52E99B30137638A370C976
  • createdAtMillis - 1708801791857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761231916672733655B256B6A289DD14BE73682314BA72357C6F7180D5EC52E99B30137638A370C976