Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 00:11:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7A45CBE4D68EA013C65B03AD47C85C59F074A0F8A6F8EEA3BB1048AB39218FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Once again, as per the Supreme Court, there is no such thing as a "hate speech" exception for the First Amendment. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761177455405228535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7A45CBE4D68EA013C65B03AD47C85C59F074A0F8A6F8EEA3BB1048AB39218FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1708733470641
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761177455405228535E7A45CBE4D68EA013C65B03AD47C85C59F074A0F8A6F8EEA3BB1048AB39218FE