Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 02:58:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C78A61B62281354D48D453B2B58B691D926CFC534E2F1292903DC480B10E2F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Once again, as per the Supreme Court, there is no such thing as a "hate speech" exception for the First Amendment. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761177455405228535
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C78A61B62281354D48D453B2B58B691D926CFC534E2F1292903DC480B10E2F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1708743483356
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17611774554052285355C78A61B62281354D48D453B2B58B691D926CFC534E2F1292903DC480B10E2F6