Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 20:09:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1CC33D18C2638B5EA97371AAC43A998B18214F22683D8886C1903FEFE4D4394
Participant Details

Original Note:

Factually correct, adding further information on CN isn't needed, put it in the comments CN using Daily Mail as a reliable source is objectionable. Daily Mail have been flagged as unreliable source by the likes of Google and Wikipedia. They have an awful reputation in the UK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761086031976104312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1CC33D18C2638B5EA97371AAC43A998B18214F22683D8886C1903FEFE4D4394
  • createdAtMillis - 1708718975832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761086031976104312E1CC33D18C2638B5EA97371AAC43A998B18214F22683D8886C1903FEFE4D4394