Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 17:55:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 491A137AEF6346BCED7E3AFEDC0EED72B713C373D7C92533335F20C797B450AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Factually correct, adding further information on CN isn't needed, put it in the comments CN using Daily Mail as a reliable source is objectionable. Daily Mail have been flagged as unreliable source by the likes of Google and Wikipedia. They have an awful reputation in the UK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761086031976104312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 491A137AEF6346BCED7E3AFEDC0EED72B713C373D7C92533335F20C797B450AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1708710928146
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761086031976104312491A137AEF6346BCED7E3AFEDC0EED72B713C373D7C92533335F20C797B450AB