Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 10:39:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF
Participant Details

Original Note:

There are genuine unanswered concerns about Rachel Clarkes CV and the stories she recounts, upon which this programme is based on. https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/anomalies-in-tv-doctor-s-claimed-qualifications?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760972975803600960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF
  • createdAtMillis - 1708684753406
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176097297580360096061C38E78DD715EC49296F87ED9EE9B0EB5F38F002F18FB3BAA5912027C73AABF