Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 08:12:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7D852549B93BFA58201453AC835FA4F0ACDE479A464F5FDC41C054642A4A175
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the larger point is about how often emasculated is used versus the more obscure usage of the female equivalent which as suggested by the note is defeminised. The original post while hyperbolic conveys its point accurately and the note though technically true is arbitrary

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760923974786003219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7D852549B93BFA58201453AC835FA4F0ACDE479A464F5FDC41C054642A4A175
  • createdAtMillis - 1708675946200
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760923974786003219A7D852549B93BFA58201453AC835FA4F0ACDE479A464F5FDC41C054642A4A175