Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 08:36:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85E53B5432987201515DE2222F6077FDB95A1F116EF6A281F34578F17962A2E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the larger point is about how often emasculated is used versus the more obscure usage of the female equivalent which as suggested by the note is defeminised. The original post while hyperbolic conveys its point accurately and the note though technically true is arbitrary

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760923974786003219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85E53B5432987201515DE2222F6077FDB95A1F116EF6A281F34578F17962A2E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1708677378009
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176092397478600321985E53B5432987201515DE2222F6077FDB95A1F116EF6A281F34578F17962A2E6