Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 11:28:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 270D467521E5A7A0E2FEBCD6FE2BEB3FB9E65DCE0033D209F296B3ED6D9C9BDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the larger point is about how often emasculated is used versus the more obscure usage of the female equivalent which as suggested by the note is defeminised. The original post while hyperbolic conveys its point accurately and the note though technically true is arbitrary

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760923974786003219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 270D467521E5A7A0E2FEBCD6FE2BEB3FB9E65DCE0033D209F296B3ED6D9C9BDA
  • createdAtMillis - 1708687723289
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760923974786003219270D467521E5A7A0E2FEBCD6FE2BEB3FB9E65DCE0033D209F296B3ED6D9C9BDA