Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 11:41:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5ED65E9B092A720A460D79BAAF3C9337804D6CE3E617745A9FB6D000AE3A9931
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note confirms that the statement is correct, so it’s not needed. It also doesn’t link to sources for the wind power claim. If you want to discuss whether that’s a *useful* comparison (both numbers are negligible), do that in the comments. https://ourworldindata.org/nuclear-energy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760874887923605951
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5ED65E9B092A720A460D79BAAF3C9337804D6CE3E617745A9FB6D000AE3A9931
  • createdAtMillis - 1708688465224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17608748879236059515ED65E9B092A720A460D79BAAF3C9337804D6CE3E617745A9FB6D000AE3A9931