Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 00:30:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, The above post is simply sharing a personal anecdote. They do not claim that Google is pro censorship, if anything said post only implies that searches which are pro censorship are more popular.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760805704812614138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930
  • createdAtMillis - 1708648228538
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760805704812614138DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930