Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 02:30:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 798DFFC70B5BBEA2A3AAFCC9E80E0728E5EB07F608736DAE8873C4EBCA785843
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, The above post is simply sharing a personal anecdote. They do not claim that Google is pro censorship, if anything said post only implies that searches which are pro censorship are more popular.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760805704812614138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 798DFFC70B5BBEA2A3AAFCC9E80E0728E5EB07F608736DAE8873C4EBCA785843
  • createdAtMillis - 1708655418691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760805704812614138798DFFC70B5BBEA2A3AAFCC9E80E0728E5EB07F608736DAE8873C4EBCA785843