Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 11:14:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E5BB31D29D7F16017C434E103B7ED382C2FC26FFA5A339792D7AEE7CB5FB622
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, The above post is simply sharing a personal anecdote. They do not claim that Google is pro censorship, if anything said post only implies that searches which are pro censorship are more popular.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760805704812614138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E5BB31D29D7F16017C434E103B7ED382C2FC26FFA5A339792D7AEE7CB5FB622
  • createdAtMillis - 1708686869056
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17608057048126141385E5BB31D29D7F16017C434E103B7ED382C2FC26FFA5A339792D7AEE7CB5FB622