Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-23 05:23:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, The above post is simply sharing a personal anecdote. They do not claim that Google is pro censorship, if anything said post only implies that searches which are pro censorship are more popular.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760805704812614138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1708665798546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760805704812614138481F1D7E7ED5F991CAB9EAACC9830399D230CB23F0E6D6DFAFCBF6FFED5535E0