Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 18:51:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08EF5F352F67454434D136B3FEF3B86CD2FC4E11917AF9A4F5E695BC381E45A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

De antwoorden op de vragen gesteld in deze post worden beantwoord in de arresten betreffende de twee zaken. Zaak Reuzegom: https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20230606_95228447 Zaak Acid: https://www.rechtbanken-tribunaux.be/sites/default/files/media/reatpi/west-vlaanderen/files/vonnis-22-februari-2024-anoniem-voor-pers.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760695293803208817
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08EF5F352F67454434D136B3FEF3B86CD2FC4E11917AF9A4F5E695BC381E45A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1708627903557
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 176069529380320881708EF5F352F67454434D136B3FEF3B86CD2FC4E11917AF9A4F5E695BC381E45A5