Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 16:04:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE4F4642A641DD64A0725D484835685AB98B09D701F1D34871CF8E6F71598E04
Participant Details

Original Note:

Falso. Como informou Mortágua, logo na primeira menção ao caso, caso o inquilino não respondesse a carta em menos de um mês, mesmo tendo mais de 65 anos, implicaria na aceitação das alterações do contrato (Art. 30 e 31) https://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?nid=1779&tabela=leis Apenas em 2020 foi julgada inconstitucional por isso https://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt/tc/acordaos/20200393.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760670485891956807
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE4F4642A641DD64A0725D484835685AB98B09D701F1D34871CF8E6F71598E04
  • createdAtMillis - 1708617863684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760670485891956807FE4F4642A641DD64A0725D484835685AB98B09D701F1D34871CF8E6F71598E04