Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 16:59:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 694EC1A7964A6DA3670C8C72B7AC154ED7C49B5DEBFE5891EEFA18743E4E0F6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

No link divulgado, não foi feita nenhuma menção à história usada no post. A história foi usada apenas como isca para atrair cliques e rodar anúncios no site. Isso viola a política do X de não "Incluir mídias que sejam compartilhadas de modo enganoso ou com falso contexto". https://help.twitter.com/pt/rules-and-policies/manipulated-media

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760487645656867211
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 694EC1A7964A6DA3670C8C72B7AC154ED7C49B5DEBFE5891EEFA18743E4E0F6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1708621171265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760487645656867211694EC1A7964A6DA3670C8C72B7AC154ED7C49B5DEBFE5891EEFA18743E4E0F6A