Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 02:14:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32457129CA884CE7976DA1A4053CF6E3C5704840E1A6380AAB3D3FB284DC0A98
Participant Details

Original Note:

Any good code would 'test' to seek results of the feed back loop on changed variables. If you need to reply to test, please at least be coherant and not spam in the CN. since this is my first community note, yes, this is also a test to reply to the test.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760471338899185809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32457129CA884CE7976DA1A4053CF6E3C5704840E1A6380AAB3D3FB284DC0A98
  • createdAtMillis - 1708568077620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176047133889918580932457129CA884CE7976DA1A4053CF6E3C5704840E1A6380AAB3D3FB284DC0A98