Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 08:57:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3009725B84F95B2F6488A09AD1AC81E3690AA9E22DF4FDCB2F6B3CA5EE350E3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Any good code would 'test' to seek results of the feed back loop on changed variables. If you need to reply to test, please at least be coherant and not spam in the CN. since this is my first community note, yes, this is also a test to reply to the test.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760471338899185809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3009725B84F95B2F6488A09AD1AC81E3690AA9E22DF4FDCB2F6B3CA5EE350E3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1708592221195
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17604713388991858093009725B84F95B2F6488A09AD1AC81E3690AA9E22DF4FDCB2F6B3CA5EE350E3E