Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 01:25:07 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 098C4ABBD353665EEFBD33E2206B30EE264E4ABFCC7D04D98B4ECE60D9FC33EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Any good code would 'test' to seek results of the feed back loop on changed variables. If you need to reply to test, please at least be coherant and not spam in the CN. since this is my first community note, yes, this is also a test to reply to the test.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760471338899185809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 098C4ABBD353665EEFBD33E2206B30EE264E4ABFCC7D04D98B4ECE60D9FC33EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1708565107273
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760471338899185809098C4ABBD353665EEFBD33E2206B30EE264E4ABFCC7D04D98B4ECE60D9FC33EF