Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 03:03:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 868A389929576AF0A0245507189CC20AF5C2BB710EC932B61023630C870015EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the underlying point of the post is that Rittenhouse was acquitted by a jury, but the poster clearly believes Rittenhouse is guilty. Factually, Rittenhouse was not declared innocent. This post does not need any note as it is both contextualized and expressing opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760379471104725206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 868A389929576AF0A0245507189CC20AF5C2BB710EC932B61023630C870015EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1708570989674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760379471104725206868A389929576AF0A0245507189CC20AF5C2BB710EC932B61023630C870015EA