Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-22 01:13:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 687849BED745CF348C71989C9E80E750C1B7124B0E582ACD16F425AEA85D43D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the underlying point of the post is that Rittenhouse was acquitted by a jury, but the poster clearly believes Rittenhouse is guilty. Factually, Rittenhouse was not declared innocent. This post does not need any note as it is both contextualized and expressing opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760379471104725206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 687849BED745CF348C71989C9E80E750C1B7124B0E582ACD16F425AEA85D43D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1708564434985
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760379471104725206687849BED745CF348C71989C9E80E750C1B7124B0E582ACD16F425AEA85D43D7