Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 19:29:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F8868F0F0FDF7EBD0939ABE40A5A5519934B4AF80763E6EEA0B9CA1A14813F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the underlying point of the post is that Rittenhouse was acquitted by a jury, but the poster clearly believes Rittenhouse is guilty. Factually, Rittenhouse was not declared innocent. This post does not need any note as it is both contextualized and expressing opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760379471104725206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F8868F0F0FDF7EBD0939ABE40A5A5519934B4AF80763E6EEA0B9CA1A14813F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1708543794340
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17603794711047252060F8868F0F0FDF7EBD0939ABE40A5A5519934B4AF80763E6EEA0B9CA1A14813F8