Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-21 21:02:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E3272B6388DA69D864D4E81CBC6D5A944BAA5590F1B8155308CFA46E0C08AD4F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Indiana court stated explicitly that it was not removing the child due to conflict over gender identity. The justification was that the child suffered from anorexia and needed care they would not have received without intervention. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf
All Note Details