Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 22:35:42 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 607CCC45FCE8158A25302617919C661EDDF4DD4200A5D3DA911AE3F072A0F4E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Indiana court stated explicitly that it was not removing the child due to conflict over gender identity. The justification was that the child suffered from anorexia and needed care they would not have received without intervention. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760360639216636174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 607CCC45FCE8158A25302617919C661EDDF4DD4200A5D3DA911AE3F072A0F4E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1708554942689
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1760360639216636174607CCC45FCE8158A25302617919C661EDDF4DD4200A5D3DA911AE3F072A0F4E0