Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 22:21:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F3E12B4593FC44DC250FE54005E37B4C0729940DFA8373461D8F4A603B10889
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Indiana court stated explicitly that it was not removing the child due to conflict over gender identity. The justification was that the child suffered from anorexia and needed care they would not have received without intervention. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760360639216636174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F3E12B4593FC44DC250FE54005E37B4C0729940DFA8373461D8F4A603B10889
  • createdAtMillis - 1708554061054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17603606392166361745F3E12B4593FC44DC250FE54005E37B4C0729940DFA8373461D8F4A603B10889