Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 20:48:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55EF5FDD2C3F6CCADE3DD743864C4E579883C9E28830367567F2C4E04B88C2F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Indiana court stated explicitly that it was not removing the child due to conflict over gender identity. The justification was that the child suffered from anorexia and needed care they would not have received without intervention. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760360639216636174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55EF5FDD2C3F6CCADE3DD743864C4E579883C9E28830367567F2C4E04B88C2F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1708548510398
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176036063921663617455EF5FDD2C3F6CCADE3DD743864C4E579883C9E28830367567F2C4E04B88C2F6