Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 21:51:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45B2DD1F7F0E276D0357A033CF697A1A72A073E33F053ED48234C7A823812B48
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Indiana court stated explicitly that it was not removing the child due to conflict over gender identity. The justification was that the child suffered from anorexia and needed care they would not have received without intervention. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760360639216636174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45B2DD1F7F0E276D0357A033CF697A1A72A073E33F053ED48234C7A823812B48
  • createdAtMillis - 1708552260301
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176036063921663617445B2DD1F7F0E276D0357A033CF697A1A72A073E33F053ED48234C7A823812B48