Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 18:06:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D5944E768B47F76804D4914472C1151D5C8AF561F00AE9B49F2E3A885BC1FE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Indiana court stated explicitly that it was not removing the child due to conflict over gender identity. The justification was that the child suffered from anorexia and needed care they would not have received without intervention. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-450/299507/20240201140120036_Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760360639216636174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D5944E768B47F76804D4914472C1151D5C8AF561F00AE9B49F2E3A885BC1FE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1708538807865
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17603606392166361740D5944E768B47F76804D4914472C1151D5C8AF561F00AE9B49F2E3A885BC1FE5