Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 21:58:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F60C0002629AFC7E6C9178B43039E140D4D8A197543FCAC30C7C6DFE1DB559D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Posting ist irreführend. Als Anwalt einer stellt sich der Autor des Posts eindeutig auf eine Seite und versucht zudem, die eidesstattlichen Aussagen der Correctiv-Mitarbeitenden als unglaubwürdig zu diskreditieren. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/correctiv-kontert-vor-gericht-bei-streit-um-potsdamer-treffen-19532991.html?GEPC=s9&premium=0x9b654d2bdaef8a8d263502b97f6666016d352cd7a3cdf725e9bb6008962e8ee3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1760358994445550071
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F60C0002629AFC7E6C9178B43039E140D4D8A197543FCAC30C7C6DFE1DB559D5
createdAtMillis - 1708552734200
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1760358994445550071F60C0002629AFC7E6C9178B43039E140D4D8A197543FCAC30C7C6DFE1DB559D5