Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 18:00:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA78ED32938F701F8314D4F1A0BB9081E08C5EAE2C4728B561DB9E062351E0AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Posting ist irreführend. Als Anwalt einer stellt sich der Autor des Posts eindeutig auf eine Seite und versucht zudem, die eidesstattlichen Aussagen der Correctiv-Mitarbeitenden als unglaubwürdig zu diskreditieren. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/correctiv-kontert-vor-gericht-bei-streit-um-potsdamer-treffen-19532991.html?GEPC=s9&premium=0x9b654d2bdaef8a8d263502b97f6666016d352cd7a3cdf725e9bb6008962e8ee3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1760358994445550071
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EA78ED32938F701F8314D4F1A0BB9081E08C5EAE2C4728B561DB9E062351E0AD
createdAtMillis - 1708538420014
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1760358994445550071EA78ED32938F701F8314D4F1A0BB9081E08C5EAE2C4728B561DB9E062351E0AD