Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 20:52:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EDB5870C6E9A52E8718035B0729DAF291B46098AF8EA2B300817AF1E6827178
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Posting ist irreführend. Als Anwalt einer stellt sich der Autor des Posts eindeutig auf eine Seite und versucht zudem, die eidesstattlichen Aussagen der Correctiv-Mitarbeitenden als unglaubwürdig zu diskreditieren. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/correctiv-kontert-vor-gericht-bei-streit-um-potsdamer-treffen-19532991.html?GEPC=s9&premium=0x9b654d2bdaef8a8d263502b97f6666016d352cd7a3cdf725e9bb6008962e8ee3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1760358994445550071
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 7EDB5870C6E9A52E8718035B0729DAF291B46098AF8EA2B300817AF1E6827178
createdAtMillis - 1708548730569
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17603589944455500717EDB5870C6E9A52E8718035B0729DAF291B46098AF8EA2B300817AF1E6827178