Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 19:42:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 50E0367A4A351900643F92F850F6311E1E00031B428DE63059699FC5530B1CAA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das Posting ist irreführend. Als Anwalt einer stellt sich der Autor des Posts eindeutig auf eine Seite und versucht zudem, die eidesstattlichen Aussagen der Correctiv-Mitarbeitenden als unglaubwürdig zu diskreditieren. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/correctiv-kontert-vor-gericht-bei-streit-um-potsdamer-treffen-19532991.html?GEPC=s9&premium=0x9b654d2bdaef8a8d263502b97f6666016d352cd7a3cdf725e9bb6008962e8ee3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1760358994445550071
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 50E0367A4A351900643F92F850F6311E1E00031B428DE63059699FC5530B1CAA
createdAtMillis - 1708544563772
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 176035899444555007150E0367A4A351900643F92F850F6311E1E00031B428DE63059699FC5530B1CAA